If you’re part of the 81% of companies without an enterprise file sync and share (EFSS) solution implemented across your company, you likely know that your users are using Dropbox or something similar. But you might not have considered all of the ways that consumer file sync-and-share systems (CFSS) – such as Dropbox – put your business at risk.
To eliminate the risks, the report gives four recommendations, one of which is deploying an EFSS system. See the rest of Osterman’s recommendations.
Osterman then surveyed enterprise EFSS decision-makers and influencers on the key factors that make EFSS different from CFSS. They found surprisingly consistent agreement, especially around content security. Two areas with around 90% agreement are metadata storage and end-to-end encryption (emphasis added):
A significant majority of the organizations surveyed agreed that for an in-house EFSS solution, metadata should be kept in-house instead of the cloud.
Moreover, the vast majority agree that data should be fully encrypted between endpoints, with no intermediate steps where data is not encrypted.
Of course, these content security concerns aren’t news to us at CTERA. We spend a lot of time thinking about security for our file sync and share solution.